In this quick Blender 2.5 video tip we demonstrate how to easily model a rounded-off square form by using snapping/retopology tools.
User Submitted Images
No images submitted yet
Discussion
27 Responses to “Tip: Creating a Rounded-off Square Form”Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.











i think it is not opening
Hi bgr, the video has been fixed and is now live. It failed during the upload.
How long does it take to upload?
Hi Kieran,
The video is live now. It apparently failed during upload and me, in my late-night stupor didn’t realize it.
That is a slick trick. I’m definitely going to find a use for that one.
Nice tip!! Thanks.
Very cool…thanks Jonathan
Very cool tip. Thanks! That “snap to other object” feature will definitely come in handy.
Very cool! On one level this is 101 Blender knowledge, but I just didn’t know that one. Should come in handy in other places as well…. and now I know how to make better topology for many uses…..
I think these small nifty tips are often way more practical for me than all those great volumetric-smoke-indirectly-lit tuts, because I can use these ones on an everyday basis! so thanks again for sharing!
Very useful tip, thank you!
your little tips are fantastic.
thanks Jonathan
You can also use proportional editing:
1- Add a plane
2- subdivide it in 9 parts
3- turn on the proportional editing and set it to sphere (or whatever you want)
4- select the center vertex of the plane and grab it up in the z axis (be sure that the range of the proportional editing fits all the plane)
5- now you have the sphere mesh, you just need to extrude it like in the video…
Hey Dude Paulo Bardes
Thanks alot for that extra way, sorry Mr. Williamson, but I was unable to do this in the 2.49 version.
Thanks to you both.
Nicke Der. Out!
pretty cool!
these “tip” videos are awesome
Cool tip as usual Jonathan. I noticed it’s easier to do the “Edge Slide”, after having unchecked the icon ” project vertices on the surface of an other object”, which you did afterwards. Otherwise the vertices have a tendancy to project on the other side of the cube part of the mesh.
Wow! That was one problem solved for me. Great tips.
Thanks for de-mystifying the retopo tool!
yay just the nifty trick that i need to make fine interiors for my scenes *thumbsup*
great hint !!!! thanks a mile for these!
qool, I like it..
Hey Mr. Williamson could you do more videos in blender 2.49 plz.
Thanks alot.
Nicke Der. Out!
Here’s a faster way: take a cube, and subdivide it 3-4 times. Select the center vertex on the top face, and move it up along the z axis with proportional editing on (o key) and set to sphere or root. Adjust the amount of falloff (scroll with MMB) so that all of the vertices on the top face are being affected, and voilĂ !
Somehow, this trick doesn’t seem to work in Blender 2.63. I’ve done it several times before and it’s always worked perfectly. In 2.63, when I click “G” and left click, the entire plane moves downwards to touch the top of the sphere but it will not deform to conform to the shape of the sphere. Am I doing something wrong or has the retopo behavior in 2.63 changed?
Hi Stephen,
Are you projecting the plane from Edit Mode or Object Mode. In order for the shape to conform you have to do it from Edit Mode. Nothing has changed in 2.63 for retopo.
Cheers,
Jonathan
I’m doing it in edit mode just as you did in the video. I even made sure I was in vertex select mode. I’ve done this several times in the past using earlier versions of the Blender and it’s always worked like a charm. I thought I was doing something wrong so I watched the video again and tried it several times but I kept getting the same result so this really has me scratching my head.
I’ve finally discovered what I’ve been doing wrong! The addition of the “snap onto self” option beside the “snap onto other objects” button in Blender 2.63 had me all confused. What a silly mistake! I can’t believe it took me an entire day and countless tries to spot it. I wish there were a way to magnify the buttons on the header. Thanks for the help, Jonathan!
Good hear you got it working!