<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tip: Wireframe Overlay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cgcookie.com/blender/2009/05/02/tip-wireframe-overlay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cgcookie.com/blender/2009/05/02/tip-wireframe-overlay/</link>
	<description>Blender 3D Tutorials and Training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:36:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Deighan</title>
		<link>http://cgcookie.com/blender/2009/05/02/tip-wireframe-overlay/#comment-73006</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Deighan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 00:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgcookie.com/blender/?p=519#comment-73006</guid>
		<description>I just got a notification in the email about this tutorial from wordpress, as if it were just recently posted. But it looks like this is back from 2009 lol. Any ideas why?

Jeremy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got a notification in the email about this tutorial from wordpress, as if it were just recently posted. But it looks like this is back from 2009 lol. Any ideas why?</p>
<p>Jeremy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: organic garden</title>
		<link>http://cgcookie.com/blender/2009/05/02/tip-wireframe-overlay/#comment-70177</link>
		<dc:creator>organic garden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgcookie.com/blender/?p=519#comment-70177</guid>
		<description>Hello, i believe that we noticed you visited my web site so i got here to “return the prefer”.I am trying to to find issues to enhance my web site!I assume its ok to make use of a few of your concepts!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, i believe that we noticed you visited my web site so i got here to “return the prefer”.I am trying to to find issues to enhance my web site!I assume its ok to make use of a few of your concepts!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://cgcookie.com/blender/2009/05/02/tip-wireframe-overlay/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 01:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgcookie.com/blender/?p=519#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to achieve the same effect but with the nodes? I&#039;d like to use one object only rather then duplicate it. I&#039;m trying in 2.5 with the nodes but it seems that the wire isn&#039;t working when I mix it with the base shader. Same happens in 2.49.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to achieve the same effect but with the nodes? I&#8217;d like to use one object only rather then duplicate it. I&#8217;m trying in 2.5 with the nodes but it seems that the wire isn&#8217;t working when I mix it with the base shader. Same happens in 2.49.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codexus</title>
		<link>http://cgcookie.com/blender/2009/05/02/tip-wireframe-overlay/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Codexus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 18:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgcookie.com/blender/?p=519#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Rather than going into edit mode and scaling the duplicated mesh, just using the &#039;ZOffs&#039; option in the wireframe material seems to work just as well to make sure that the wireframe stays on top of the original object.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than going into edit mode and scaling the duplicated mesh, just using the &#8216;ZOffs&#8217; option in the wireframe material seems to work just as well to make sure that the wireframe stays on top of the original object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Williamson</title>
		<link>http://cgcookie.com/blender/2009/05/02/tip-wireframe-overlay/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 17:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgcookie.com/blender/?p=519#comment-184</guid>
		<description>There is a &quot;Solid Wire&quot; script that allows you to create an actual mesh wire frame. It has it&#039;s uses but is not nearly as clean as this method.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a &#8220;Solid Wire&#8221; script that allows you to create an actual mesh wire frame. It has it&#8217;s uses but is not nearly as clean as this method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charliemcf</title>
		<link>http://cgcookie.com/blender/2009/05/02/tip-wireframe-overlay/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>charliemcf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgcookie.com/blender/?p=519#comment-183</guid>
		<description>i think theres a script built in that does this?
in the scripts menu?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think theres a script built in that does this?<br />
in the scripts menu?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

